UMR 2-Year Housing Policy Analysis and Recommendation
This pilot study about health in all policies examines University of Minnesota Rochester (UMR) students' experiences with on-campus housing, focusing on the new two-year housing requirement. As UMR's student population grows, understanding housing satisfaction is critical to fostering a healthy campus environment. The research team conducted 13 semi-structured interviews with students from four housing options: University off-campus apartments, apartment style-dorms, traditional first year dorms, and off-campus. The findings revealed both positive and negative aspects of on-campus living. Students valued the sense of community provided by on-campus housing, which supported their academic and social success. However, concerns about affordability were widespread, with participants questioning whether the costs of housing and meal plans were justified. Food quality, variety, and safety in certain housing areas were also common concerns. A key finding was that many students needed more awareness of the two-year housing requirement, with some supporting it and others feeling it imposed an unnecessary financial burden. Overall, the study highlights areas for improvement, particularly affordability, safety, and meal options. Better communication and adjustments to housing policies could improve student satisfaction and retention at UMR.
Group members: Sarah Allen, Britney Bui, Grace Mikkelson, Avi Misra, and Muna Mohammed